Search results for ‘Subject term:"older people"’ Sort:
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Post-reform community care for elderly people: who gets how much of what service?
- Authors:
- DAVIES Bleddyn, FERNANDEZ Jose, WARBURTON Raymond
- Journal article citation:
- Care Plan, 3(2), December 1996, pp.25-30.
- Publisher:
- Positive Publications/ Anglia Polytechnic University, Faculty of Health and Social Work
Evaluates community care reforms in terms of services for older people and how well they are targeted. Looks at the issues relating to the effects on the services and the cost implications.
Securing good care for older people: taking a long-term view
- Author:
- DAVIES Bleddyn
- Journal article citation:
- Ageing Horizons, 6, 2007, Online only
- Publisher:
- Oxford Institute of Ageing
- Place of publication:
- Oxford
The paper aims to explain and evaluate two key features of Securing Good Care for Older People, the Wanless Report on alternative mechanisms for funding long-term care of older people. The first is the new elements of the methodology for evaluating the alternatives. The paper argues that more successfully than previously and analyses in other countries, these elements focus attention on what are really the core issues: the means and ends which are the unique foci of long-term care, and estimates of the consequences of alternatives for them. By doing so, the report faces the politicians and policy analysis and research communities with a formidable challenge, to master and contribute to the development of the new framework and evidence. Failure to meet the challenge will increases the risk that the policy system will reinforce rather than weaken causes of gross inequity and inefficiency caused by the under-funding of long-term care seemingly unanswerably demonstrated by the report. The second key feature is the type of funding model the Report recommends given expected changes in the balance between demands and public expenditure. It is argued that the report’s analysis as successfully transforms the state of the argument about this as much as about the framework, methodology and evidence for evaluating alternatives, demonstrating the relative weakness of models widely advocated a decade ago. Part 2 discusses how to build on the Report. It discusses the framing of issues and the analysis of evidence for each of the key foci of the report’s main contribution to evaluation methodology. Finally the paper discusses whether the recommended model would be the wisest choice given the environment likely during the next few decades.