Search results for ‘Subject term:"mental health problems"’ Sort:
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Review of compliance: Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust: Vale Assessment and Treatment Unit
- Author:
- CARE QUALITY COMMISSION
- Publisher:
- Care Quality Commission
- Publication year:
- 2011
- Pagination:
- 19p.
- Place of publication:
- London
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust was reviewed as part of a targeted inspection programme in hospitals that care for people with learning disabilities. The Intensive Support Service provides inpatient assessment and treatment of people with a learning disability who have mental health problems or challenging behaviour. Two essential standards of quality were examined: Outcome 4: People should get safe and appropriate care that meets their needs and supports their rights; and Outcome 7: People should be protected from abuse and staff should respect their human rights. The report includes a summary describing why the review was carried out, the main findings and action required. It also provides detailed findings for the two essential standards and outcomes reviewed. Improvements were found to be needed for essential standard Outcome 4.
Review of compliance: Partnerships in Care Limited: Burston House
- Author:
- CARE QUALITY COMMISSION
- Publisher:
- Care Quality Commission
- Publication year:
- 2011
- Pagination:
- 18p.
- Place of publication:
- London
Burston House was reviewed as part of a targeted inspection programme in hospitals that care for people with learning disabilities. The hospital provides assessment, treatment and continuing care to patient’s with mild to moderate learning disabilities who may also have other complex mental health problems, such as autistic spectrum disorder, aspergers syndrome, personality disorders. Two essential standards of quality were examined: Outcome 4: People should get safe and appropriate care that meets their needs and supports their rights; and Outcome 7: People should be protected from abuse and staff should respect their human rights. The report includes a summary describing why the review was carried out, the main findings and action required. It also provides detailed findings for the two essential standards and outcomes reviewed. The provider was found to be compliant with both standards of quality and safety reviewed.
Checking how the Mental Health Act is used: easy read
- Author:
- CARE QUALITY COMMISSION
- Publisher:
- Care Quality Commission
- Publication year:
- 2010
- Pagination:
- 30p.
- Place of publication:
- London
This document is the easy read version of the first report into the work of the Care Quality Commission on monitoring the use of the Mental Health Act. It covers the period from April 2009 until March 2010. It describes the findings of these visits, listing aspects that need to be improved. It considers the following: taking people into hospital and keeping them there; children or young people; safe places; general hospitals; what things are like for people who are kept in hospital under the Mental Health Act; locked wards; low secure services; involving patients and looking after their rights; Independent Mental Health Advocates; Mental Health Tribunals; people being stopped, held or kept away from others; patients agreeing to treatment; Second Doctors; electro-convulsive therapy; and supervised community treatment. It concludes that services need to get better at involving patients who are kept in hospital in their care and treatment, checking whether patients understand and can agree to treatment, and treating people as individuals and making sure rules to keep people safe do not take away everyone’s rights.