Search results for ‘Subject term:"learning disabilities"’ Sort:
Results 1 - 4 of 4
The Government's annual report on learning disability 2005: valuing people: making things better
- Author:
- GREAT BRITAIN. Department of Health
- Publisher:
- Stationery Office
- Publication year:
- 2005
- Pagination:
- 54p.
- Place of publication:
- London
The Government has to give Parliament a report on learning disability each year. This is the third report since Valuing People
Protection of vulnerable adults scheme in England and Wales for adult placement schemes, domiciliary care agencies and care homes: a practical guide
- Author:
- GREAT BRITAIN. Department of Health
- Publisher:
- Great Britain. Department of Health
- Publication year:
- 2006
- Pagination:
- 40p.
- Place of publication:
- London
The Government is determined that vulnerable adults should be afforded the greatest protection possible from harm. In addition to raising standards of care through National Service Frameworks, regulating providers of care in a more thorough and consistent way than hitherto, and introducing national minimum standards for regulated care services, the Government has taken action to specifically address the abuse of vulnerable adults. This guidance includes reference to pre-employment checks for domiciliary care providers and managers, and pre-employment checks for adult placement scheme providers and managers.
Winterbourne View: transforming care one year on
- Author:
- GREAT BRITAIN. Department of Health
- Publisher:
- Great Britain. Department of Health
- Publication year:
- 2013
- Pagination:
- 77
- Place of publication:
- London
This report reviews progress in improving the quality of care for vulnerable people, following abuse of residents at Winterbourne View hospital. It summarises the changes to improve the quality of care for vulnerable people, specifically those with learning disabilities or autism who also have mental health conditions or behavioural problems. The report covers surveys and monitoring programmes designed to track patients and observe their care; improvements to the commissioning of health and care services; the regulation and inspection of services; and work needed to make sure no one finds themselves in inappropriate care settings. It considers quality and safety issues in respect of advocacy, medication, positive behaviour support, physical interventions and workforce development. The report includes an individual case study and examples of service providers and projects which demonstrate practice that is both effective and sensitive to the needs of vulnerable people. An Easy Read version is also available. (Edited publisher abstract)
The second year of the Independent Mental Capacity Advocacy Service 2008/2009
- Author:
- GREAT BRITAIN. Department of Health
- Publisher:
- Great Britain. Department of Health
- Publication year:
- 2009
- Pagination:
- 54p.
- Place of publication:
- London
The Mental Capacity Act 2005 created the Independent Mental Capacity Advocate (IMCA) service as a safeguard for people without the capacity to make certain important decisions and without family or friends to support them. The Act also introduced a legal duty on NHS bodies and local authorities to refer eligible people to the IMCA service. The service started on 1st April 2007 and this is the report on its second year’s work. There was a 27 percent rise (to 6582) in the number of people receiving representation from the IMCA service compared to the first year. This comprised a 14 percent increase (to 3496) for decisions relating to accommodation moves; a 102 percent increase (to 387) for decisions relating to care reviews; a 43 percent increase (to 968) for decisions relating to serious medical treatment; and a 29 percent increase (to 960) in adult protection proceedings. There is concern that the service is not yet reaching all the people who would benefit, particularly with regard to the continuing low rate of referrals for serious medical treatment. A small study revealed that commissioners were mainly pleased with the service though they wanted IMCAs to be more available and to deliver reports faster. MCA leads in local authorities commented on the professionalism of IMCAs and the benefits to the client group. However, there was a perception within health care settings that involving an IMCA delayed treatment..