Search results for ‘Subject term:"learning disabilities"’ Sort:
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Service users' views of physical restraint procedures in secure settings for people with learning disabilities
- Authors:
- JONES Peter, KROESE Biza Stenfert
- Journal article citation:
- British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(1), March 2007, pp.50-54.
- Publisher:
- Wiley
The appropriateness and justification of physical restraint procedures in secure learning disability settings is an emotive issue. This paper examines the views of 10 service users from secure residential facilities who are restrained frequently. Using a semi-structured interview schedule, Service users were interviewed about their restraint experiences. They reported that restraint can lead to potentially abusive situations and that staff should try other approaches before restraining someone. They were divided on whether it calmed them down and whether staff enjoyed performing restraint. Other comments included that restraint may or may not serve a purposeful goal and that there is a definite need for staff training for those involved in performing restraint.
Service users and staff from secure intellectual disability settings: views on three physical restraint procedures
- Authors:
- JONES Peter, KROESE Biza Stenfert
- Journal article citation:
- Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 12(3), September 2008, pp.229-237.
- Publisher:
- Sage
- Place of publication:
- London
The appropriateness of and justification for physical restraint procedures in intellectual disabilities settings is an emotive issue. It creates a number of ethical dilemmas for nursing staff. This article examines the views of service users and nursing staff from secure residential facilities where restraint is used frequently. Both groups were asked to rate three videotaped restraint procedures for their acceptability. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the acceptability ratings of the methods of restraint. Service users were then interviewed about their restraint experiences. They reported feeling very angry, sad, stressed and confused and not at all happy or relaxed when being restrained. Scores indicated that participants were significantly happier and less stressed after restraint than during restraint.