Search results for ‘Subject term:"learning disabilities"’ Sort:
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Cognitive-behavioural treatment for men with intellectual disabilities and sexually abusive behaviour: a pilot study
- Authors:
- MURPHY Glynis, et al
- Journal article citation:
- Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51(11), November 2007, pp.902-912.
- Publisher:
- Wiley
A pilot study providing group cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for two groups of male sex offenders with ID in the south-east of England is described. Measures of change in sexual knowledge, victim empathy and cognitive distortions were collected, together with a log of further sexually abusive behaviour. Fifteen men were offered treatment but some dropped out and some declined to take part in the research. The results for the eight men who consented to the research and completed treatment showed significant positive changes in sexual knowledge and victim empathy (two men completed both groups, making 10 sets of data in all). Cognitive distortions showed significant change on only one of the two measures. Some men showed further sexually abusive behaviour either during or after the treatment group (all had been previously diagnosed as on the autistic spectrum). The authors call for a larger multi-site trial of treatment with a broad set of measures and the ability to analyse who benefits from such treatments and who does not.
Physical interventions with people with intellectual disabilities: staff training and policy frameworks
- Authors:
- MURPHY Glynis, et al
- Journal article citation:
- Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 16(2), June 2003, pp.115-125.
- Publisher:
- Wiley
Physical intervention or restraint with people who have intellectual disabilities is sometimes necessary, even though it is known to present dangers to both staff and service users (some service users have died as a result of restraint). This study aims to investigate the extent to which staff in intellectual disability services were trained in the use of physical interventions or restraint. Their views of a recent policy framework on physical interventions were also sought. There were three groups of participants: (i) group 1 included staff who had attended conferences on the Policy Framework (the conference sample); (ii) group 2 included staff from two geographical areas (the geographical sample); (iii) group 3 included staff in specialist assessment and treatment services (the SpAT sample). All participants were sent a questionnaire asking them about their training in (and use of) physical intervention methods and their opinions on the policy document. There were at least 12 different types of training recorded, including a number of varieties of Control and Restraint (C&R). By no means did all the senior staff did have training in physical intervention methods. The degree of training varied with the sample and the type of training varied with the employing organization. Most participants in group 1 were very positive about the BILD & NAS Policy Framework but few staff in groups 2 and 3 had read the document. About two-thirds of the participants said their services had (or were developing) a written policy on physical interventions. There remained a clear need for further training in physical interventions and evidence on which the effectiveness of different methods of physical interventions could be judged.
Self-injurious behaviour: what do we know and where are we going
- Author:
- MURPHY Glynis
- Journal article citation:
- Tizard Learning Disability Review, 4(1), January 1999, pp.5-12.
- Publisher:
- Emerald
Self-injurious behaviour can become an intransigent difficulty, reduce people's quality of life and lead to hospital admissions or other restrictive outcomes. Over the last 15 years there have been some important developments in the treatment of severe self-injury, but the evidence is that these are making little impact on most people's lives. The reasons why this might be are discussed, and it is proposed that it is time for a radical new approach to interventions for self-injurious behaviour.