Search results for ‘Subject term:"learning disabilities"’ Sort:
Results 1 - 2 of 2
The real tenancy test: tenancy rights in supported living
- Author:
- NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT TEAM FOR INCLUSION
- Publisher:
- National Development Team for Inclusion
- Publication year:
- 2010
- Pagination:
- 2p.
- Place of publication:
- Bath
The second paper from a three-year project on Housing and Social Inclusion led by the NDTi. The briefing summarises the findings from a project to create a which aimed to provide a simple tool to help them address the issue of housing rights for people with learning disabilities. The Real Tenancy Test is a quick test to be used in supported living and tenancy based supported housing to determine if real tenancy rights are being met. It is designed to get an understanding of whether a tenancy in supported living gives real tenancy rights. It describes important things to consider when planning housing and tenancies for people, including when to use different types of tenancies and how to handle issues of capacity. It says that for the tenancy to be genuine, the following should be happening: a tenancy agreement is in place; the tenant has control over where they live; the tenant has control over who they live with; the tenant has control over who supports them and how they are supported; and the tenant has control over what happens in their home.
Supported living: making the move
- Author:
- NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT TEAM FOR INCLUSION
- Publisher:
- National Development Team for Inclusion
- Publication year:
- 2010
- Pagination:
- 2p.
- Place of publication:
- Bath
This briefing paper arises from a three year project on housing and social inclusion in England, and summarises some of the finding of the main report. It is written mainly for people who work directly or indirectly to plan, develop and provide housing and support for people with learning disabilities. It explains the difference between supported living and residential care. It also describes different types of housing and support that should be available for people, and how to go about putting them in place. Among the conclusions is the fact that while residential care might be right for some people, it should not be the only or predominant choice of housing for adults with learning disabilities. The briefing also suggests that the main focus should be maximising housing rights, choice control and independence. Access to a wider range of models is needed and as these emerge a more flexible mix of support will be required including greater emphasis on connecting people with their communities.