Physical interventions for adults with intellectual disabilities: survey of use, policy, training and monitoring

Authors:
DEVAU Roy, McGILL Peter
Journal article citation:
Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22(2), March 2009, pp.145-151.
Publisher:
Wiley

Perceived problems around the use of physical intervention (PI) to manage challenging behaviour have led to UK initiatives to encourage policy development and accredited training. However, information on PI use and the impact of these initiatives remains limited. Adult residential services within an English region were sent a questionnaire regarding PI use, policy, staff training and monitoring/management. Physical intervention use was reported by 47% of the services. Of services using PI, 65% reported having a policy governing its use and 79% reported providing staff training. Where restrictive PI was used, comparable figures were 82% for policy and 84% for training. PI use was reported to be monitored in some way by 94% of services. Opinions offered supported the reduction of PI use. Physical intervention use is widespread. National guidance on policy and training is widely followed though unimplemented by a minority. The time may be right to more explicitly aim for a reduction in PI use within services.

Subject terms:
learning disabilities, physical restraint, residential care, challenging behaviour;
Content type:
research
Location(s):
England
Link:
Journal home page
ISSN online:
1468-3148
ISSN print:
1360-2322

Key to icons

  • Free resource Free resource
  • Journal article Journal article
  • Book Book
  • Digital media Digital media
  • Journal Journal

Give us your feedback

Social Care Online continues to be developed in response to user feedback.

Contact us with your comments and for any problems using the website.

Sign up/login for more

Register/login to access resource links, advanced search and email alerts