Critical decisions and questions regarding serious case reviews - ideas from North West England

Authors:
FLYNN Margaret, KEYWOOD Kirsty, WILLIAMS Shirley
Journal article citation:
Journal of Adult Protection, 13(4), 2011, pp.213-229.
Publisher:
Emerald

Serious case reviews (SCRs) are one means of learning the lessons arising from adverse, salient incidents and tragedies, such as the death of a vulnerable adult or neglect of a number of adults in a grouped care setting. There is no template on the process of conducted an adult’s SCR, due to a concern that, while this would provide a degree of consistency, it would also lead to the danger of routinising the consideration of exceptional incidents. Therefore, rather than providing guidance on how to conduct a SCR, this article sets out some of the questions that Safeguarding Adults Boards should be asking themselves. The article is presented as sets of decision points and questions regarding the commissioning process, the management of the process, the appointment of a chair and author, the terms of reference, information-sharing, confidentiality, involving relatives and making findings public. The compliance of the process with human rights legislation is also considered. These questions challenge the perception that SCR can be streamlined, structured, codified, and constrained

Subject terms:
human rights, organisational learning, procedures, serious case reviews, safeguarding adults, good practice, Safeguarding Adults Boards;
Location(s):
England
Link:
Journal home page
ISSN print:
1466-8203

Key to icons

  • Free resource Free resource
  • Journal article Journal article
  • Book Book
  • Digital media Digital media
  • Journal Journal

Give us your feedback

Social Care Online continues to be developed in response to user feedback.

Contact us with your comments and for any problems using the website.

Sign up/login for more

Register/login to use standard search filters, access resource links, advanced search and email alerts